Vai alla Home Page About me Courseware Federica Living Library Federica Federica Podstudio Virtual Campus 3D La Corte in Rete
 
Il Corso Le lezioni del Corso La Cattedra
 
Materiali di approfondimento Risorse Web Il Podcast di questa lezione

Luigi Paura » 14.Digital transmission on fading multipath channels


Digital transmission on fading multipath channels

Outline:

  • Introduction to wireless channels.
  • Linear Time-Variant model: multipath and doppler spread.
  • Tapped Delay Line Channel Model.
  • Coherence Bandwidth and Coherence Time.
  • Introduction to statistical model.
  • Fading classification.

Introduction to Wireless Channels

AWGN channel model and Bandlimited AWGN one are not appropriate for modelling wireless propagation mechanisms:

  • Ionospheric propagation in the HF band.
  • Mobile Cellular Transmission.
  • Line-of-sight Microwave Radio Transmission.
  • Airplane-to-Airplane radio communications.
  • Underwater Acoustic Signal Transmission.

Fading Classification

There are three kinds of power losses in a radio communication link

Path Loss:

Pr=PtGtGr(λ/4πd)2

more in general

Pr=PtGtGr(λ/4πd)α

Loss due to slow fading effects (distance scale is in the order of 50-100 m – shadow fading).

Loss due to short range fading: distance scale is in the order of λ/2 (<10m).

Short Range Fading (1/4)

Short range fading is due to two phenomenons:

Time dispersion due to multipath.

Frequency dispersion due to radial mobility between TX and RX and/or to variability of the propagation channel properties (time-variant) → linear time-variant model.

h(t, \pi) ~~\leftrightarrow \widetilde h (t, \pi) ~~\text{complex envelope}

Short-Range Fading (2/4)

s(t)=Re\\u(t)e^{j2\pi f_c^t}\}

s(t): transmitted signal with u(t) equivalent lowpass with band Bu

The received signal in the absence of noise can be expressed as:

r(t)=Re\Biggl\{\sum_{n=0}^{L(t)}\alpha_n(t)u(t-\tau_n(t))e^{j(2\pi f_c(t-\tau(t))+\phi_{D_n})}\Biggr\}

 

n = 0 – LOS

n ≠ 0 - LOS

L(t) – number of paths

αn(t)- time – variant attenuation factor associated with the nth path

τn(t) - propagation delay associated with the nth path

ΦDn – phase shift due to doppler

Short-Range Fading (3/4)

The nth distinguishable path can be generated by a single scatterer or by a cluster of no-distinguishable scatterers.

If the delays τi and τj are very different:

\tau_i,\tau_j :|\tau_i-\tau_j|>>1/B_u~~~~~T~~(B_u \equiv \text{band of u(t)}) \Rightarrow

 

the components i and j are distinguishable (wideband fading)

\text{if} ~~\tau_1 \approx \tau_2 \approx \tau \Rightarrow u(t-\tau_1)\approx (t-\tau_2)

The i-th and j-th replica overlap → multipath non-distinguishable

Short-Range Fading (4/4)

If the τi and τj of two components are similar →

The paths are not distinguishable and the contributions combine in a single path (cluster of scatterers non- distinguishable).

Wideband channels (Bu>>1) have distinguishable paths  → each term in the sum corresponds to a reflection or to a cluster of non-distinguishable paths.

If each term is due to a cluster of scatterers, αn(t) changes noticeably with the distance because of the phase changes of the single non-distinguishable contributions.

Linear Time-Variant Model -LTV (1/3)


Linear Time-Invariant Model – LTI (2/3)

If the parameters are time-invariant:

h(t, \tau)=\sum_{n=0}^L \alpha_n e^{-j\phi_n}\delta (\tau-\tau_n)=h(\tau)

The channel introduces only a time-dispersion and if L,τn are deterministic, the time-dispersion can be measured as the maximum delay with respect to the LOS contribution or to mean delay


Linear Time-Invariant Model – LTI (3/3)

Alternative definition:

RMS delay spread

\tau_{rms}\sqrt{\frac{{\sum_{k=1}^{L}}\tau_k^2\sigma_k^2}{\sum_{k=1}^L \sigma_k^2}- \Biggl(\frac{\sum_{k=1}^{L}\tau_k\sigma_k^2}{\sum_{k=1}^L \sigma _k^2}}\Biggr)^2

\sigma_k^2~~~E[\alpha_k^2] rms of the kth path

Narrowband Fading

Narrowband Fading : TM << 1/Bu ≅ T  → non- distinguishable paths.

Long-range and narrowband short-range fading effects


Narrowband Fading


Tapped Delay Line Channel Model (1/3)


Tapped Delay Line Channel Model (2/3)

x(t)=Re \Biggl\{ A \sum_n \apha_n (t)e^{j2\pi f_c(t-\tau_n(t))}\Biggl\}=

=Re\{e^{j2\pi f_c^{t} z(t)}\}~~~~ \text{where z(t) is the complex envelope}

z(t)~~~~ A\sum_n \alpha_n (t)e^{-j2\pi f_c^{\tau}_n}{(t)}}=~~~~~A\sum_n \alpha_n(t)e^{-j\phi_n{(t)}}

e^{j2\pi f_c^t} \rightarrow z(t)e^{j2\pi f_ct}

At the output we do not have a phasor because z(t) is not constant → Frequency dispersion

Tapped Delay Line Channel Model (3/3)

c_n (t)~~~~\alpha_n(t)e^{j\phi_n{(t)}}

In general cn(t) is modeled as a complex gaussian process

Tm – multipath spread

T_m=L\text{x}\frac 1 {B_u} where L is the numbers of paths, \frac 1 {B_u} is the time resolution i.e. the duration of transmitted signal.


Doppler bandwidth (1/3)

z(t)=A\sum_n \alpha_n(t)e^{-j2\pi f_c \tau_n (t)}=A\sum_n \alpha_n (t)e^{-j\phi_n (t)}

The phases Φn can give rise to constructive or destructive  contributions that weaken or strengthening the amplitude of the transmitted signal, namely the presence of fading effects.

|z(t)| models the variation law of the attenuation.

Doppler bandwidth (2/3)

The variability measure of z(t) allows us to valuate the amount of spectral dispersion.

z(t) is a random signal, hence let us consider the mean square value of the bandwidth of z(t) namely,Bd

Bd = doppler Bandwidth

If Bd >>1 → the channel “varies” rapidly
If Bd <<1 ← the channel “varies” slowly

Doppler bandwidth (3/3)

Let us denote with Bu the bandwidth of the transmitted signal:

If Bd <<Bu → the channel can be assumed to be  stationary since the spectral dispersion is  negligible with  respect to  the signal bandwidth Bu.

In the time domain:

Bd<<Bu → 1/Bd >>1/Bu → TC>>TS Temporal Flat Fading, namely:

e^{j2\pi f_c t}\rightarrow x(t)= A\sum_n \alpha_n e^{j2\pi f_c(t-\tau_n)}=ze^{j2\pi f_c t}

The signal duration is much smaller than the temporal scale TC of the channel variation.

  • Contenuti protetti da Creative Commons
  • Feed RSS
  • Condividi su FriendFeed
  • Condividi su Facebook
  • Segnala su Twitter
  • Condividi su LinkedIn
Progetto "Campus Virtuale" dell'Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, realizzato con il cofinanziamento dell'Unione europea. Asse V - Società dell'informazione - Obiettivo Operativo 5.1 e-Government ed e-Inclusion

Fatal error: Call to undefined function federicaDebug() in /usr/local/apache/htdocs/html/footer.php on line 93